Of course I sent the previous Swimwatch story to the “The Crowd Goes Wild”. It would be inexcusably rude to hide public criticism from the target. I doubt that James McOnie cares whether David Wright thinks he has exceeded his sell-by-date. An ego as big as his is pretty indestructible.
I certainly did not expect a reply to my story. I thought “The Crowd Goes Wild” would do a Swimming New Zealand and meet every criticism with stony silence. Swimming New Zealand are experts at showing the cold shoulder. They can deny members their human rights, they can lie to the membership, they can pay themselves a fortune and charge the nation’s best swimmers to go to a world championship and through it all say nothing – no excuse, no reason, no apology, nothing.
I expected the same reaction from “The Crowd Goes Wild”. I was wrong. Yesterday I got a reply. Here is what it said.
“We love your passion David, however the Chiefs game was 3 days old by the time Monday’s show went to air. To expect us to cover a game that is 72 hours old is a bit unreasonable, considering we’re supposed to be a news show. Cheers.”
There are a couple of points that need to be made about their reply. First, thank you for the message. Thank you for the enthusiasm comment and thank you for the “cheers” at the end. I’m taking that as a sincere rather than an ironic farewell. I appreciate the effort taken to explain and communicate.
However there are two features of the reply that cause concern. First the claim that “we’re supposed to be a news show”. In the era of Trump there has been much discussion on the distinction between news and opinion broadcasting. The truth is many broadcasters deliberately blur the lines between news and opinion. The confusion allows participating media outlets to use selected factual news to support opinions and views they want to promote. At best “The Crowd Goes Wild” is one of these hybrid outlets. It is certainly far from a sport’s news channel. McOnie and Mulligan offer far too many opinions for the programme to ever be described as straight news.
We know for example that Mulligan “hates” Tom Brady and the New England Patriots. We know he supports the Hurricanes and the Breakers. McOnie’s adoration of all things Waikato is as well-known as it is tiresome. Almost every subject concludes with a one minute offering of the presenters’ opinions. There is nothing wrong with that. In fact part of the charm of the program is its high opinion content. It just means that their claim to be “news” is ridiculous. As opinion providers they should know better. .
And so the claim of “news” status to justify ignoring the Chiefs and Highlanders result is simply not true. “The Crowd Goes Wild” is not a “news” show. At best it is a hybrid news and opinion mongrel. Which means, that the claim of “news” status to justify ignoring a rugby result journalists didn’t like, has no validity. In fact the claim to “news” status is as devoid of decency as those who made the decision to ignore the Chiefs’ defeat.
The second justification for the decision to ignore the weekend’s Super Rugby result is, “To expect us to cover a game that is 72 hours old is a bit unreasonable.” Like their claim to “news” status, this is simply not true. It is a lie. On Tuesday 19 February, the day I received “The Crowd Goes Wild” email, I watched the program to check on their 72 hour deadline. The show reported on ten sporting subjects. Of the ten there were three that were older than 72 hours. 30% of the items covered were outside the time limit I had just been told was the program’s measure of “unreasonable”.
First the show did discuss the Chiefs loss to the Highlanders. That game was now 96 hours in the past; so much for their 72 hour rule.
Second the show covered the young driver, Lawson, signing a contract with Red Bull. That happened in the middle of last week on Lawson’s 17th birthday – 144 hours ago – double the 72 hour rule.
Third the show reported on the trials Team New Zealand had gone through to develop the successful foiling technology used in the America’s Cup. That “news” was first reported on the Stuff website on the morning of the 15th February 2019 – 110 hours ago. The events it described occurred years ago. Either way the claim that anything more than three days is out-of-date is simply not true.
I am delighted “The Crowd Goes Wild” took the time to reply to my post. My delight is tempered only by the rubbish included in their message. Instead of making up excuses that can so easily be disproved they would have been better to simply say, “Oops made a mistake, sorry. We’ll sort out McOnie and move on.” That honesty would have immediately had me back as a viewer.
As it is their reply means they are not only bad losers, they are dishonest and stupid as well. Cheers.
PS: Since posting this article I attempted to extend to “The Crowd Goes Wild” the courtesy of advising them of my reply. I attempted to do this by posting the link to their Facebook Messenger page. And oh dear me, the precious wallflowers at “The Crowd Goes Wild” appear to have blocked my contact. I guess the original story of being bad losers is confirmed