Archive for October, 2018

Chameleon In Wadaland?

Wednesday, October 3rd, 2018

 Swimming New Zealand (SNZ) announced this week that Dr David Gerrard has been appointed SNZ President. I’m not sure what to make of the decision. Is it good? Is it bad? Or doesn’t it really matter all that much?

Let’s deal with those in reverse order. Perhaps the appointment doesn’t matter. After all, the position is primarily a figurehead role. The President can attend SNZ Board Meetings but doesn’t have a vote. He can discuss problems with the CEO but has no power to order compliance. Influence and effectiveness depends on the President’s power of personality and his desire to see change. Time will tell whether Gerrard has the personality and the desire to bring about reform in New Zealand swimming.

And that’s where the bad comes in. From all I’ve seen it is such a shame that, part-way through medical school, Gerrard had his personality surgically removed. He comes across as the ultimate political animal; quietly spoken, agreeing with everyone, never rocking the boat. Gerrard and Francis obviously attended the same finishing school. But is that approach effective? It certainly works for the individual. Gerrard has, I was going to say climbed but slithered is a better verb, his way to the top of various bureaucracies. He is or has been New Zealand Olympic team Chef de Mission, Drug Free Sport New Zealand Chairman, World Rugby Member, Anti-Doping Advisory Committee and Chairman of Therapeutic Use Exemption Committees of WADA, Drug Free Sport NZ, FINA and World Rugby.

That is a good Resume. But, has Gerrard been effective? Has he brought about change? And that is where the cracks begin to show. His most recent appointment is to the position of Chairman of the Therapeutic Use Exemption Committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency. In one form or another Gerrard has been working for the world doping agency since 2013. What has happened in that time?

That’s the rub. WADA is a mess. Take Russia for example. WADA was responsible for imposing and maintaining sanctions on Russian cheats. The Agency did this pretty well until September 20 when they decided to abandon all that’s good and decent and allow Russia back into world sport. In spite of clear evidence to the contrary they also found no link to the Russian President, ignoring the Putin signed law that prohibited any doping samples leaving the country without being tested in Russia first.

Craig Lord recently wrote about WADA’s spineless behaviour in Swimming World. Here is the link to his article. It is well worth reading.

https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/doping-oversight-and-the-olympic-blame-games/

A key paragraph in Graig Lord’s conclusion is shown in the table below.

The WADA Athletes Commission said they were “devastated” to hear of reinstatement (of Russia) “without the completion of the roadmap” as originally agreed. In a statement, the athletes noted: “We had expected that WADA would stand up for clean athletes and clean sport, instead we have seen nuance and pragmatism overtake justice and accountability. The roadmap that clean athletes and WADA had been relying on ended up with WADA coaching Russia on how to ask for concessions, changing the terms, and the world’s athletes being cut out.” Truth hurts sometimes — and both Russia and WADA ought to be smarting over this from the athletes:

“Russia has used its athletes, committed the biggest doping scandal of the century, corrupted the anti-doping and sport movements, and has now been welcomed back on a promise, without even complying with the rules. This is not good enough.

And in all the time Russia was abusing its own athletes and shafting athletes from all over the world, Dave Gerrard has occupied a prominent position in WADA, the organisation responsible for ensuring justice. I’m told New Zealand voted against the reinstatement deal. But did Gerrard speak up? Did he resign in protest? Did he do anything that was effective? Did he protect New Zealand swimmers when it was really important? Sure as hell doesn’t seem like it.

Perhaps Gerrard is just a pretty face with a flash CV. Perhaps there is not much substance behind the mask. Perhaps he is all fine-sounding words. Perhaps he has no more spine that the world agency that made him one of their Chairman. I don’t know. The jury is out. We will soon be able to see whether the WADA disaster is merely a temporary stain on an otherwise stellar career or is in fact representative of Gerrard’s political manoeuvring.

Which brings us to the good aspects of Gerrard’s appointment. That’s easy – product knowledge. For many years the lack of product knowledge in the Head Office of SNZ has been of serious concern. The combined total of what Francis, a club age-group coach, Johns, a failed high school sport’s swimmer and Cotterill, a masters recreational triathlete know about elite world swimming would occupy the back of a very small postage stamp. No one is suggesting Schubert type knowledge is needed to run the national swimming federation. But you do need to know something. The vacuum that passes as knowledge in Antares Place is seriously bad.

The arrival of Gerrard addresses that problem. Dave Gerrard certainly knows about swimming. The table below shows the highlights of his swimming career.

·         6 x National 110 yard men’s butterfly champion (1962, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68).

·         10 x National 220 yard men’s butterfly champion (1960 – 1969).

·         1962 British Empire and Commonwealth Games, Perth, Australia – two finals

·         1964 Tokyo Olympics representative – semi-final.

·         1966 British Empire and Commonwealth Games, Kingston, Jamaica – one gold and one bronze medal and a third final

Not only was Gerrard successful, he did it through an era when New Zealand sport, especially athletics, dominated world sport. I doubt the influence of that time has faded from Gerrard’s memory. It still burns bright in most of us who lived and competed through those years.

If the appointment of Gerrard can bring to modern New Zealand swimming something of his product knowledge, combined with the successful spirit of the 60s, SNZ will have found itself a very fine leader indeed. His first step though should be to sort out the shambles that is WADA’s gutless treatment of a bunch of Russians cheats.

The Almighty Dollar

Monday, October 1st, 2018

 Some readers may wonder what is at the heart of our criticism of Swimming New Zealand (SNZ). The answer lies in the boring and dusty tomes of political philosophy. You see it is our belief that private enterprise is the best way of structuring competitive sport. That does not mean we support doctrinal right-wing bigotry in all areas of New Zealand life. In fact the government has a vital role to play in managing areas responsible for the weaker member of society. For the young, society should provide free education, for the sick, society should provide a free health service and for the elderly, society should provide for their care.

But elite competitive sport is not populated by weak members of society. Private enterprise is the vehicle best suited to providing world class competitive sport. The USA has the most private of private club-based competitive swimming structures and is the world’s strongest swimming nation. Most importantly a private enterprise environment allows for vital structural diversity. Swimmers can choose between a variety of clubs and programs depending on their interest and program preference. Market diversity is best and vital for providing a healthy, strong, competitive and elite sport.

Sadly the CEO of Sport NZ, Peter Miskimmin, does not see it that way. Instead of using his power and money to encourage and strengthen sporting private enterprise, he has focused on building a huge socialist empire. Millions have been poured into centralised structures under the control of sporting federations. Why has he taken that option?

The only reason I can think of is his wish to promote his own power, power that allows him to control a personal sporting empire. From day one Miskimmin spent the government’s millions on building huge sporting bureaucracies. In sport after sport MIskimmin increased the size of national federation head offices. That did not make sport more efficient but it did multiply Miskimmin’s empire and his influence. In every case the people employed were Miskimmin clones bought and paid for by central government. And when it was done Miskimmin controlled the sport. In swimming for example Johns and Francis know that without Miskimmin’s money they don’t get paid. The same reliance is apparent in football, cycling, rowing and triathlon. Thanks to high profile and independent Willis, Adams and Walsh, athletics has largely avoided Miskimmin’s snare.

Having established control of the head offices of the main Olympic sports Miskimmin set about his next step. He started promoting centralised training centers under the control of and managed by coaches employed by national federations. Simple really; Miskimmin controls the head office; the head office controls the national training center; ipso facto Miskimmin controls the training provided by most of New Zealand’s Olympic sports.

This example of rampant socialism represented by Miskimmin’s policy will not work, certainly not in main stream Olympic sports like swimming and athletics. And the introduction of the Francis Folly will not change that truth. Antares Place still has far too much control over the provision of swimming training. Squad lists of privileged swimmers and worthless national training camps have not changed. From all that I see the promised demise of the centralised training squad hasn’t happened. Certainly the coaching intern and squad swimmers are still occupying lanes at the national training center.

Centralisation will fail for a number of reasons. As we have said, it fails to provide the competitive diversity so vital to sporting success. Centralisation compromises the life-blood of sport – competition. In almost every decision made by SNZ competition is compromised. For example, artificial regions have compromised club competition. And second, the people employed are not fit to lead the sport. They were employed for their obedience, not their competence. They are overpaid to buy their loyalty to the Miskimmin cause. CEO after CEO of sports in New Zealand are plaster clones of one another. The expression, “couldn’t run a piss up in a brewery” was invented for Miskimmin-run sports.

And it has led to the most stunning wrongs Just imagine this – Johns is paid in the order of $160,000. Lauren Boyle after she won a World Championships was paid $40,000. No one on this good earth will convince me that Steve Johns is worth four times more than Lauren Boyle. That is a pathetic disgrace. Boyle’s contribution as a case of winning well, as a model of good behavior and as an example of how to manage a career, is worth more than Johns should ever be paid.

Swimwatch has reported previously on the disgustingly low percentage of SNZ’s income (less than 10%) paid to swimmers. But that’s what you get when you socialise a competitive industry. Just ask those responsible for dismantling Soviet industry. The New Zealand federation follows the example of FINA. The world body spends 5% of its income on swimmers. The other 95% is wasted on first class air fares, posh offices, five star hotels and Michelin dinners. London’s Craig Lord has long fought to see FINA improve its payments to swimmers.

Reform will involve reversing the Miskimmin steps that resulted in the cancer. He started by seizing control of the Head Offices. Just before the Moller Report the swimming Regions almost took back control of SNZ. Miskimmin recognised the danger and bulldozed a weak Brian Palmer and Bronwen Radford into rolling over, giving the sport away. The Francis Folly is pointless window dressing. That does not change control of the sport. Certainly never trust Cotterill, Johns or Francis to bring about change. Turkeys do not vote for Christmas.

Reform needs to start with the Regions constitutionally taking back control of Antares Place. Only then can the structure be reformed. Only then can clubs genuinely share power in the sport’s management. Only then can swimmers be rewarded by being paid a minimum of 50% of the sports income. Only then can we move away from paying obscene salaries to the likes of Johns and Francis. Only then can SNZ get out of learn-to-swim tuition. Only then will the centralized training group be immediately closed down. On and on it goes. But first secure constitutional control of Antares Place. The rest will be easy and fun – especially handing Johns his “Don’t come Monday” letter. Can I do that?